The businesses, organizations and individuals who see here have signed-on to support and endorse the Gigabyte March on Washington!
Byting
back!
To
view comments and feedback please visit the links below:
Associations
Industry
(CLEC's ISP's, WISP's, etc.)
Aggregators,
Suppliers and other industry related businesses
Consumers
If you would like to join our virtual march on Washington please reply by email to cdelorenzi@patriot.net.
Be sure to include your name or the name of your business, your city and state, phone number (not required) as well as the group you believe best represents you.
|
|
Consumer
Support and Comments
Bob Adams
Adams Marketing, Inc.
Warrenton, VA
"The disappearance of independent ISP's would be a travesty. The frustration of dealing with the giants is growing NOW. Imagine if they become the only choice!"
Chuck
B
Reading,
PA
"I
just want to strongly urge you to keep competition at the highest
levels for broadband access in the USA"
Rob and Julie Beatty
South Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Lana Bian
Vienna,
VA
Lonnie
Brown
Albuquerque,
NM
"I
oppose the deregulation of broadband services."
Raymond Caldwell
Ennis, TX
Steve Carow
Chicago, IL
"Please do not allow the phone companies to limit access to their phone lines. Our country must remain competitive by actually promoting competition within our borders. The Internet, VOIP, Web browsers, and the declining price of telephone calls were all developed by smaller companies in a very competitive and innovative environment. The large phone companies create the antithesis to this environment."
James Cullum
Minneapolis, MN
"I've been using DSL from first US West then Qwest for years now and I am happy with it. However, much of my satisfaction is due to my ISP, Visi.com. If I had been saddled with that bloated monolith, MSP, as many were when Qwest dropped its ISP service, I doubt my opinion would be so positive. To deny a choice off ISP in this situation would lead to monopolies foisting bad service upon the public."
Elizabeth de Lorenzi
Fairfax,
VA
Nancy Dressing
Pinehurst, NC
How is it fair that the FCC should be allowed to dismantle the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that the Congress voted in to force telephone companies to sell lines to small Internet service providers to increase competition?"
"We had a local ISP long before we were able to connect to the "big guys". Why should this hard-working ISP be endangered by the big guys. Local employees will lose jobs and little guys who can't afford the "big guys" will suffer. Locals are doing the best job. Keep 'em in business. Share the lines!
Richard England
Beaverton, OR
"The move on the part of BellSouth is nothing more than an attempt to increase their profit at the expense of the regional and local "little guy". BellSouth and others are coasting on the momentum of the infrastructure built up over the last 50 years and rather than try to improve the situation by equipment support and replacement and improve band width, they want to litigate and legislate their opponents out of existence. The communications infrastructure is fast becoming a shared asset not a solely owned enterprise and should be open to all users. Don't the giant "tromp on the little guy"."
Skip Frank
Grapevine, TX
Allan Grant
Vienna,
VA
Gary
Hagen
Nokesville,
VA
"Found
out about this from the Green Party. Our group are all small
business owners who are sympathetic to the plight of small ISP's."
Christopher Hamersly
Fairfax,
VA
Elizabeth Hamersly
Olympia,
WA
Justin Hersh
Germantown, MD
"Continually chipping away at the ability of the independent ISP's to offer competitive service is dangerous. The Internet revolution was not kick-started by the corporate behemoths. It was the small companies that brought people online and kept innovating until the Net became the mainstream phenomenon it is today."
Steve and Sandy Hollod
Interlachen, FL
Napi
Ippolito
Richmond,
VA
"Please
do the right thing for the future of public communication."
Imran Kahn
Dallas, TX
David Z. Kaufman
DZK
Law
Fairfax,
VA 22030
"As both an economist and attorney, I see no benefit to reducing competition among ISP's. Reduced competition leads to higher prices, reduced service and a lack of innovation. The proposal would certainly have these results and provide only a problematical benefit."
Joseph Kondrot
Control Information and Entertainment
Washington,
D.C.
Debi Lichorowic
Planet Pitch
Middleburg,
VA
Geoff Livingston
TelecomHub Board Member
Taylor Marshall
Frankfurt, KY
"Keep municipals - start competition"
Pat and Gary Meeks
Orange Park, FL
Estelle Morrison
Ft.
Worth, TX
Larry Nisenoff
Annandale,
VA
"The
ability to innovate is key to the continued competitiveness of the
US economy!"
A.H.
Perkins
Reading,
PA
"It
was the small independent businessman that made this a great nation. If this nation and its citizens are to survive the future it will
be done through the Small Businessman NOT THE LARGE OR MULTI-NATIONAL
CORPORATIONS."
Dan Porter
Porter Morgan
Keller, TX
Anne
L. Potter
Portland,
OR
"Any
elimination of small local or regional ISP's will only create oligopolies
and increase costs of both broadband and dialup Internet access.
Such action can only place Internet service into the situation television
cable services are already in. They raise prices at will and
with no constraint. Their prices are prohibitive for some
segments of the population. To create the same conditions
for Internet access will only inhibit the expansion of a service
that has become almost critical to the survival of many businesses."
Brian
Rosino
"Please
don't destroy the availability of the Internet (information) to a
broad group of consumers!"
Timothy N. Seward
Potomac, MD
"One wonders why the BOCs think that they will maximize their returns on their newly installed broadband local exchange facilities by denying access to local ISPs. That dog won't hunt, particularly with all of the alternative cable and satellite broadband services now coming to market. In fact, in that context, the BOCs are johnny-come-latelies to the broadband internet access marketing game. If they,[the BOCs] had any brains at all, [and they do not], they would perceive instantly that for them, all of the independent ISPs represent the perfect means of highly leveraged, instant entry into the broadband, internet access business. The BOCs should be signing long-term access deals with the ISPs, not trying to destroy them. No consumer who believes in the competitive market and its long term benefits to buyers and providers alike will buy broadband services from Verizon, or any other BOC, when broadband cable and satellite are available. The Commission should not permit the BOCs to shut down the competitive, reasonably priced and innovative ISP services now available to consumers and small businesses. To do so would be a huge fraud on the public and a clear violation of the Commission's duty under the Communications Act."
Ellen Shulby
Pinehurst, North Carolina
Robert
Soligan
Fairfax,
VA
"I work in the
technology industry and I am worried about what will happen to my
job should the Bells take over the Internet."
Ryan Tanner
Benicia, CA
"I am disturbed by efforts to extinguish the independent ISP. Despite the claims of the phone companies, competition is not as healthy as they may lead you to think. Satellite internet is not a solution. The speeds are laughable and reliability poor. Wireless internet is not available in my area. I have yet to hear of any plans by Pacific Gas and Electric to implement BPL. Comcast, my local cable company, still does not offer internet access at my location, despite constant advertisements in the mail saying otherwise. This is in the San Francisco Bay Area."
Thomas Ulaszek
Richardson, TX
"It is inconceivable that this type of action is even being contemplated. It is a continuation of less services for money to those companies that are already a monopoly."
Paul Unger
Paul Unger NBS Search, Inc.
Al Villaret
Fairfax,
VA
Harry Wagner
Wagner Dean
Irving, TX
Ted Westerfield
St.
Augustine, FL
"Time Warner's Road Runner and Bell South's DSL service operate as an inter-industry oligopoly in NE Florida. In other words, they have effectively shut out competition and offer higher than average rates."
Brian Willis
Cincinnati,
Oh
"As
the employee of an ISP, I am afraid that I am going to lose my job
if the SBC petition is granted."
Glenn
Wright
Kansas City, MO
"Only
by allowing small ISP's to compete can the government ensure strong
competition, low prices for consumers, and the freedom to choose
the services we want. Forcing companies out of business is
un-American!"
Thomas Zabel
Dallas, TX
"I have just become aware of this FCC ruling. I believe that this ruling is, at best, a poor one which should be reconsidered. While it is fair for the major Telcos to receive a good return on their investment in facilities and services, including broadband services, it is not fair or proper to create a situation which eliminates the investment that various independent ISPs have made in order to provide their services. It is also not fair to eliminate choices for consumers - especially choices of service providers - and to essentially force consumers to do business with only one, or perhaps two, provider(s) in a given location."
|